…cars, buildings, clothes, locations, weather, labels, notes – everything is
important!
Judi, my first cousin once removed, inherited a pile of photos and memorabilia from
my mother’s parents and three of mom’s siblings, Judi’s grandfather included. Recently, she conned me into an
agreement to sort, scan, ID, label, and otherwise “process” them. I am well along with the process and
having a great time. I’m not sure
who conned whom.
Most of the pics are my relatives so identification of persons has not been much of a
problem. The big challenge has been
determining the chronology. I have
the critical birth, marriage and death dates and locations. To my amazement, every little detail
on the pics is important and presents valuable chronological clues. Here are some of my experiences.
You know how photographers will include a yardstick in the picture when size is a
factor? From birth to about 20 years
old, my first cousin Roland lived near and sometimes with my maternal
grandparents. Mom had 8 brothers and
sisters and the family was quite close.
Whenever a camera came out, the aunts and uncles would grab Roland.
Roland was a living temporal “yardstick”. Watching him grow gives a pretty good
estimate of chronology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The grandparents built a cottage on Lake Gogebic in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. From the time the first board was put
in place until the last of the aunts and uncles was gone, that cottage was a
family focal point. The cottage went
from a small square building through many, many changes over the years and was
the background for innumerable pics.
A brief history is presented in
Ponogram #24 Lake Gogebic in the Early Years.
Scrutiny of pics of the cottage shows the structural changes, paint jobs, re-roofs,
and repairs. Some changes have
relative order (no pun intended) – e.g., the extension of the second floor was
never reversed. Others require a
memory of how things were when – porch boards went E-W at one time and N-S
another time. But Roland is still
around and he has vivid memories of the place and I share many of them.
|
|
|
|
|
Second floor was
like an attic
|
Roof was raised
and extension added
|
|
|
|
|
ľ” boards on porch didn’t last
|
2” planks were better
|
|
|
I have very few pics of two of my mom’s sisters, so when I ran across a pic with both
of them and their husbands, I was very pleased.
I scanned it and set about finding some reason to assign a year. The pic was clear with nice contrast. All four people were vibrant and
healthy. The later marriage of the
two couples was 1934. The earliest
death of the four was 1961. I was
about to split the difference when I noticed something familiar in the
background. Peeking over my uncle
Pete’s righft shoulder from the buffet was a framed picture. It was my 1951 high school graduation
photo. Of course it is not certain
that this picture was taken in 1951, but it is certainly between 1951 and 1961
and I’m guessing closer to 1951. I
think it unlikely that my photo was displayed for very long after I sent it to
them. Maybe two dustings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here’s a great picture of Grandpa on the cottage porch. But wait, what do I see in the window
behind him? Why, it’s Grandma, with
that mischievous grin on her face!
(Maybe the only one who can see the grin is me, and Grandma is sending it to me
in this photo over 75 years.) Moral? Never crop a picture until you have
examined it thoroughly.
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Tillner
|
Fredrika Tillner
|
|
|
Along with all the photographs, Judi sent me one of Grandma’s cookbooks. It is printed in Swedish, Grandma’s
native tongue, and is very old and fragile.
Some of the recipes are crossed out, probably having been tried and
rejected. Most of the pages with
blank space are covered with handwritten recipes – some Swedish but mostly
English. One bears the date 1911. Apparently children had access to the
book, since there are scribbles here and there.
The inside of the back cover bears a stick figure and I think the word
SANDIN!
Tucked into Grandma’s cookbook was a clipping from a newspaper. It showed the somewhat formal picture
of a family with a number of kids and another picture of the same family in the
same pose 20 years later. Apparently
Grandma was taken with the concept and perhaps suggested it to her kids. Whether that provoked it or not, over
the years when the family would assemble, it was customary to take one picture
with the six girls in birth order, one with the three boys, and one with all
nine siblings. At least six sets of
these treasures exist.
Two of these sets were taken by different cameras with different formats. The first was color, square, and had
the printed date Mar 58 in the margin. The
second was black and white, rectangular, with Apr 61. While scanning, it was easy to treat
these as two different reunions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After scanning all the pics, I set about to recheck and verify identifications and
chronology prior to labeling them.
One step in verification was to merge all the pics and view them as a slideshow
to watch the aging processes. That’s
when I saw too many similarities in the 1958 and 1961 sets. The girls were good about birth
order, but to wear the same clothing three years apart? And stand in the same room? And have the same hairdos? I don’t think so.
Finally another detail soaked into my spongy old brain. Whereas all the other reunions tended
to be casual dress, or at least sporty, this group was in class A. And whereas all the planned reunions
were in the summer and had pics taken outside, these pics were taken indoors. Of course, a winter funeral.
Grandma Tillner died 1957-12-27. Her
funeral was 1958-01-02. Both sets of
pictures were taken after her funeral, in her house. Film from the first camera may not
have been developed and printed until Mar 58.
The black and white film may have been developed in 58, but someone may
have requested copies in Apr 61. Two
reunions became one funeral. Even
printed markings on pics should be questioned.
Attendees at the funeral were verified with Grandma’s funeral description from the
local newspaper. Information for
other photographs was confirmed by other clippings. I have only begun to download and
process newspaper clippings, but they can provide valuable clues of when and
where people were.
|
|
|
|
Funeral Description
|
Sample News Clippings
|
|
|
|
|
Given a large bunch of photographs, it might be valuable to sort them initially
according to physical characteristics like size, shape, black/white vs. color,
framed vs. loose, and taken by Land vs. non-Land.
Within these piles, sort further based on markings like dates, batch
numbers, photographer names/locations and handwritten notes (all taken with a
grain of salt).
These sorts may or may not provide valuable information, but pics with like
characteristics MAY be related in some way – taken the same year or by the same
individual. The entire
identification, chronology, labeling process is iterative and this sorting
should be done at some time, whether early or late may not matter.
When you start looking at the content of the photos, everything matters and can help
with chronology and identification.
Here are some things to keep in mind:
|
|
|
individual appearance
|
shape of head, ears, eyes (esp. helpful with babies), hairdos, hair color, amount of hair
(pattern baldness), weight, facial hair
|
physical conditions
|
casts, bandages, canes, crutches, glasses, pregnancy
|
clothing
|
uniforms, fashions, patterns, level of formality
|
event
|
Christmas, birthday, anniversary, wedding, funeral, reunion
|
“birds of a feather”
|
people in the pic usually have something in common
|
surroundings
|
buildings, dogs, cars, roads, bodies of water, natural and manmade objects, signs, seasons
|
|
|
|
I may never be “done” with this process.
I plan to merge a bunch of my pics with this bunch and see what comes of that. Every time I look through them I see
something new that gives me a different perspective and/or causes me to adjust
chronology. However, it is a labor
of love and I am very grateful for the opportunity. OK cousins, send me more!
AFTERWORD
If you have already digitized your photographs, added dates, names, locations, and
labels, shared with others and backed up the digital files in more than one
physical location, bless you. If you
haven’t, do so immediately. Those
who come after you will bless you for your effort. It is sad to have a photograph that
obviously meant something to a deceased relative and have no idea who, what,
where, or when.
|
|
|